Advertisment

Tirofiban Shows Promise as an Alternative Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke

author-image
Anthony Raphael
New Update
NULL

Tirofiban Shows Promise as an Alternative Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Advertisment

Tirofiban vs Aspirin for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Advertisment

According to the results of the TREND trial, the intravenous (IV) administration of tirofiban, an antiplatelet agent, for 72 hours showed promising results in reducing early neurologic deterioration in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) compared to oral aspirin therapy. The TREND trial was aimed at comparing acute antiplatelet monotherapies for AIS patients without thrombolytic or thrombectomy options.

The trial enrolled 426 patients in China, with the results showing that tirofiban reduced the incidence of neurological deterioration within 72 hours compared with aspirin. No cases of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage or severe bleeding occurred, and mortality was similar between groups. These findings were presented at the ISC24 conference.

Previous Studies on Tirofiban

Advertisment

Previous studies, such as the Study of Efficacy of Tirofiban in Acute Ischemic Stroke and the Safety of Tirofiban in Acute Ischemic Stroke trial, aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of tirofiban in the early management of stroke but were stopped early due to lack of efficacy. However, the recent findings from the TREND trial highlight the importance of exploring new treatment options for stroke patients and warranting further investigation.

The Role of Tirofiban in Endovascular Therapy

Another study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intra-arterial administration of low dose tirofiban during endovascular therapy in patients with large ischemic core volumes on initial brain CT. It found that intra-arterial tirofiban administration was associated with a lower 90-day mRS score and change of NIHSS compared with the baseline.

Advertisment

This study collected data from AIS patients who underwent endovascular therapy at a single tertiary hospital. The exclusion criteria included poor quality of the initial brain CT, unknown mRS score at the three-month follow-up after EVT, and stroke caused by arterial dissection.

Filling the Gap with Tirofiban

The TREND trial aimed to fill the role of confirming the efficacy and safety of a dual antiplatelet approach in patients with moderate-to-severe stroke. The results showed that 75.2% of tirofiban-treated patients achieved non-disability at the follow-up time point vs 68.4% of those in the control group. This suggests a potential alternative treatment for stroke patients.

Advertisment

Future Directions for Tirofiban Research

Despite these promising results, further studies powered for clinical outcomes are needed to determine the efficacy of tirofiban for functional endpoints. The trial was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China, Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality, and Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission.

The findings from these studies and trials underline the importance of ongoing research into alternative treatments for AIS. As the understanding of tirofiban's role in stroke management continues to evolve, it is hoped that this will lead to improved treatment strategies and outcomes for stroke patients.

Advertisment
Chat with Dr. Medriva !